J.H. Chapman Group L.L.C.Unique expertise in food - Value beyond expectations
HomeServicesJHC AdvantageTeamTransactionsNewsPrintable BrochureLibraryOfficesContact Us

News Release



This article appeared in the February 2005 issue of Chain Leader Magazine

CREDIT COUNSELING
David L. Epstein, Principal
J.H. Chapman Group, L.L.C.

David L. Epstein, a principal at J.H. Chapman Group, may be best known for his annual analysis of restaurant transactions. But the investment banker is also an industry player. Last year, for example, his Rosemont, Ill.-based firm participated in the sale of three bankrupt chains. Chain Leader grilled Epstein, who once managed a full-service restaurant, about managing investment capital.

Q. Did restaurant bankruptcies accelerate or decelerate in 2004?
A. By my count, we saw only five last year, and that’s lower than in the past. There’s a reason for that. There are not too many lenders allowing over-leverage to take place. So we have fewer restaurant companies in trouble today than in the past – and a slowing down of bankruptcy filings.

Q. Why do so many bankrupt chains end up being sold instead of reorganized?
A. Actually, more than 80 percent of restaurant chains in bankruptcy are sold. That’s a very high percentage. Companies in other industries are typically reorganized. In a restaurant bankruptcy, however, it makes sense to try to sell the assets of the brand in order to realize value to the shareholders.

Q. Why do private companies go bankrupt more often than public companies?
A. First, public companies don’t have the same leverage issues. They can weather declines in same-store sales. If that happens in a highly leveraged private company, it’s trouble. The biggest reasons restaurant companies fail is that management leverages the company too much or goes into loser sites or doesn’t hire top-quality staff. What all three reasons have in common is management itself.

Q. Are you saying management should avoid borrowing?
A. Restaurant companies do need financing to grow. If they were to use cash flow, they would not grow that quickly. They also need money to make acquisitions. What that means is managements must learn to operate differently when they are suddenly put into a high-debt situation. The money supply has put companies in perilous situations if same-store sales decline or they open a couple of bad locations.

Some managers feel the money needs to be put back into units. That’s what a lot of managers who have not been in (high-debt) situations would do. What they should do is reduce the debt. Because as soon as debt reduces, value increases. In short, you need to have fast growth, yet you always need to use cash flow to retire debt.

Q. Lender attitude toward chains is changing, isn’t it?
A. There has been a break, with more participants extending credit – meaning they are able to advance more dollars. That indicates we will see higher values. Keep in mind the money supply has a profound impact on value. If lenders are willing to extend more credit, for example, the values of chains increase. If there is a credit constriction, values decrease.

Q. Are equity funds also more eager to enter the restaurant space?
A. They are buying for price and for opportunity. Equity players have more money today then they ever had, and they are looking at the restaurant industry because it has a track record of success.

Go back to News Releases
Latest News
     France © J.H. Chapman Group, L.L.C. All rights reserved.